↓ Skip to main content

Gender Nonconformity, Perceived Stigmatization, and Psychological Well-Being in Dutch Sexual Minority Youth and Young Adults: A Mediation Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Gender Nonconformity, Perceived Stigmatization, and Psychological Well-Being in Dutch Sexual Minority Youth and Young Adults: A Mediation Analysis
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10508-012-0055-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Baams, Titia Beek, Helene Hille, Felice C. Zevenbergen, Henny M. W. Bos

Abstract

Dutch sexual minority youth and young adults (106 females and 86 males, 16-24 years old) were assessed to establish whether there was a relation between gender nonconformity and psychological well-being and whether this relation was mediated by perceived experiences of stigmatization due to perceived or actual sexual orientation and moderated by biological sex. The participants were recruited via announcements on Dutch LGBTQ-oriented community websites and then linked to a protected online questionnaire. The questionnaire was used to measure gender nonconformity, perceived experiences of stigmatization, and psychological well-being. Gender nonconformity was found to predict lower levels of psychological well-being and the mediation analysis confirmed that lower levels of psychological well-being were related to the perceived experiences of stigmatization. This mediation was not moderated by biological sex. These findings show that both research and interventions should pay more attention to gender nonconformity among young people in order to create a more positive climate for young sexual minority members.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Netherlands 2 1%
Unknown 164 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 18%
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Researcher 13 8%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 28 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 56 33%
Social Sciences 32 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 38 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,006,341
of 24,761,242 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,241
of 3,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,876
of 293,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,761,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.