↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Bacterial Protein O-Oligosaccharyltransferases and Their Glycoprotein Substrates

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of Bacterial Protein O-Oligosaccharyltransferases and Their Glycoprotein Substrates
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0062768
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin L. Schulz, Freda E. C. Jen, Peter M. Power, Christopher E. Jones, Kate L. Fox, Shan C. Ku, Joanne T. Blanchfield, Michael P. Jennings

Abstract

O-glycosylation of proteins in Neisseria meningitidis is catalyzed by PglL, which belongs to a protein family including WaaL O-antigen ligases. We developed two hidden Markov models that identify 31 novel candidate PglL homologs in diverse bacterial species, and describe several conserved sequence and structural features. Most of these genes are adjacent to possible novel target proteins for glycosylation. We show that in the general glycosylation system of N. meningitidis, efficient glycosylation of additional protein substrates requires local structural similarity to the pilin acceptor site. For some Neisserial PglL substrates identified by sensitive analytical approaches, only a small fraction of the total protein pool is modified in the native organism, whereas others are completely glycosylated. Our results show that bacterial protein O-glycosylation is common, and that substrate selection in the general Neisserial system is dominated by recognition of structural homology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 32%
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Master 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Lecturer 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,775,468
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#79,884
of 194,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,093
of 192,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,643
of 4,921 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,921 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.