↓ Skip to main content

Accounting for the role of habit in behavioural strategies for injury prevention

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accounting for the role of habit in behavioural strategies for injury prevention
Published in
International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, March 2008
DOI 10.1080/17457300701794253
Pubmed ID
Authors

Per Nilsen, Michael Bourne, Bas Verplanken

Abstract

The limited success of behavioural strategies in injury prevention has been attributed to failure to properly apply behaviour change models to intervention design and the explanation of safety behaviours. However, this paper contends that many health behaviour change interventions do not succeed because they fail to take into account the habitual quality of most health and safety-related behaviour; a more complete model of behaviour change needs to be based on a better understanding of the role of habit. The overall aim is to contribute to better understanding of behavioural strategies for injury prevention. When habits are weak, attitudes and intentions predict behaviours, but as behaviours turn into habits, they become better predictors of future behaviour than attitudes or intentions. Furthermore, where habits are strong, individuals are less likely to act on new information, evaluating counter-habitual information negatively. Integrating the concepts of strong and weak habits with upstream and downstream strategies, a framework is presented for tailoring strategies to the habit strength of the target behaviour.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Italy 2 4%
Portugal 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 44 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 24%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 10%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 15 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2011.
All research outputs
#5,283,912
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion
#65
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,313
of 95,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them