↓ Skip to main content

Does a home-based strength and balance programme in people aged ≥80 years provide the best value for money to prevent falls? A systematic review of economic evaluations of falls prevention…

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does a home-based strength and balance programme in people aged ≥80 years provide the best value for money to prevent falls? A systematic review of economic evaluations of falls prevention interventions
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2010
DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2008.060988
Pubmed ID
Authors

J C Davis, M C Robertson, M C Ashe, T Liu-Ambrose, K M Khan, C A Marra

Abstract

To investigate the value for money of strategies to prevent falls in older adults living in the community.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 247 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 18%
Researcher 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 53 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 17%
Sports and Recreations 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 63 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,671,222
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#3,560
of 6,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,166
of 174,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.