↓ Skip to main content

Immunoglobulin G level variations in treated chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: clues for future treatment regimens?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Immunoglobulin G level variations in treated chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: clues for future treatment regimens?
Published in
Journal of Neurology, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00415-013-6938-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yusuf A. Rajabally, Siew L. Wong, David A. Kearney

Abstract

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) are effective for treating chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), although treatment needs are variable and need to be individualized. Dose and frequency requirements are not currently predictable in advance. In Guillain-Barré syndrome, IVIg interpatient pharmacokinetic variations have been demonstrated in relation to clinical outcome. We studied 15 patients with CIDP following two routine courses of IVIg. IgG levels were assessed pretreatment and 14 days post-treatment. Best clinical response (BCR) was ascertained in each case, predefined, according to individual patients' circumstances, on the 10 m walk, or MRC sum score, or Jamar grip dynamometry. Correlations between IgG level variations, doses administered, weight, body mass index, BCR and infusion interval were determined. Postinfusion rise in IgG levels were correlated in individual patients (p = 0.005), but interpatient variability was high. No correlations were ascertained between IgG level variation and weight, body mass index, BCR, total dose of IVIg administered, or dose of IVIg administered per kilogram per week. There were significant correlations between total dose administered and post-infusion IgG level at 14 days (p = 0.004) and between infusion interval and mean rise in IgG level (p = 0.001) These findings suggest significant variability in IgG metabolism between patients, unrelated to minimal effective dose administered, weight, body mass index or degree of functional improvement. Required frequency of IVIg infusions may, however, importantly relate to patient-specific post-infusion rise in IgG levels hence possibly explaining inter-patient differences in treatment frequency needs. IgG level monitoring may be helpful in establishing optimum treatment regimens in individual cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Other 7 18%
Researcher 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Neuroscience 7 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,192,189
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,962
of 4,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,046
of 192,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#32
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.