↓ Skip to main content

Energetic analysis of fragment docking and application to structure-based pharmacophore hypothesis generation

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Energetic analysis of fragment docking and application to structure-based pharmacophore hypothesis generation
Published in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10822-009-9268-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Loving, Noeris K. Salam, Woody Sherman

Abstract

We have developed a method that uses energetic analysis of structure-based fragment docking to elucidate key features for molecular recognition. This hybrid ligand- and structure-based methodology uses an atomic breakdown of the energy terms from the Glide XP scoring function to locate key pharmacophoric features from the docked fragments. First, we show that Glide accurately docks fragments, producing a root mean squared deviation (RMSD) of <1.0 A for the top scoring pose to the native crystal structure. We then describe fragment-specific docking settings developed to generate poses that explore every pocket of a binding site while maintaining the docking accuracy of the top scoring pose. Next, we describe how the energy terms from the Glide XP scoring function are mapped onto pharmacophore sites from the docked fragments in order to rank their importance for binding. Using this energetic analysis we show that the most energetically favorable pharmacophore sites are consistent with features from known tight binding compounds. Finally, we describe a method to use the energetically selected sites from fragment docking to develop a pharmacophore hypothesis that can be used in virtual database screening to retrieve diverse compounds. We find that this method produces viable hypotheses that are consistent with known active compounds. In addition to retrieving diverse compounds that are not biased by the co-crystallized ligand, the method is able to recover known active compounds from a database screen, with an average enrichment of 8.1 in the top 1% of the database.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 183 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 31%
Researcher 45 23%
Student > Master 24 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 14 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 60 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 22 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,408,218
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#111
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,399
of 103,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.