↓ Skip to main content

Development and NMR validation of minimal pharmacophore hypotheses for the generation of fragment libraries enriched in heparanase inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Development and NMR validation of minimal pharmacophore hypotheses for the generation of fragment libraries enriched in heparanase inhibitors
Published in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10822-009-9269-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Gozalbes, Silvia Mosulén, Rodrigo J. Carbajo, Antonio Pineda-Lucena

Abstract

A combined strategy based on the development of pharmacophore hypotheses and NMR approaches is reported for the identification of novel inhibitors of heparanase, a key enzyme involved in tumor metastasis through the remodeling of the subepithelial and subendothelial basement membranes, resulting in the dissemination of metastatic cancer cells. Several pharmacophore hypotheses were initially developed from the most active heparanase inhibitors known to date and, after their application to a pool of 27 known heparanase inhibitors and a database of 1,120 compounds approved by the FDA, a four-point pharmacophore model was selected as the most predictive. This model was subsequently applied to a database of 686 chemical fragments, and a subset of 100 fragments accomplishing completely or partially the four-point model was selected to perform nuclear magnetic resonance experiments to validate the hypothesis. The experimental studies confirmed the reliability of our pharmacophore model, its applicability to in silico databases in order to reduce the number of compounds to be experimentally screened, and the possibility of generating fragment libraries enriched in heparanase inhibitors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Australia 2 5%
Russia 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 38 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 25%
Other 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 17 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 14%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 3 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2009.
All research outputs
#4,829,384
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#214
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,186
of 103,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.