↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of oxaliplatin and paclitaxel-induced neuropathy (Alliance A151505)

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of oxaliplatin and paclitaxel-induced neuropathy (Alliance A151505)
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00520-016-3373-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deirdre R. Pachman, Rui Qin, Drew Seisler, Ellen M. Lavoie Smith, Suneetha Kaggal, Paul Novotny, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Jacqueline M. Lafky, Lauren E. Ta, Andreas S. Beutler, Nina D. Wagner-Johnston, Nathan P. Staff, Axel Grothey, Patrick M. Dougherty, Guido Cavaletti, Charles L. Loprinzi

Abstract

Oxaliplatin and paclitaxel are commonly used chemotherapies associated with acute and chronic neuropathies. There is a need to better understand the similarities and differences of these clinical syndromes. Neuropathy data were pooled from patients receiving adjuvant oxaliplatin and weekly paclitaxel or every 3 weeks of paclitaxel. Patients completed daily questionnaires after each chemotherapy dose and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy before each chemotherapy cycle and for 12 months post-treatment. Acute neuropathy symptoms from both drugs peaked around day 3. Acute symptoms experienced in cycle 1 predicted occurrence in subsequent cycles. Paclitaxel-induced acute symptoms were similar in intensity in each cycle and largely resolved between cycles. Oxaliplatin-induced acute symptoms were about half as severe in the first cycle as in later cycles and did not resolve completely between cycles. Both drugs caused a predominantly sensory chronic neuropathy (with numbness and tingling being more common than pain). Oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy worsened after the completion of treatment and began to improve 3 months post-treatment. In contrast, paclitaxel-induced neuropathy began improving immediately after chemotherapy cessation. During treatment, the incidence of paclitaxel sensory symptoms was similar in the hands and feet; with oxaliplatin, the hands were affected more than the feet. Both paclitaxel- and oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity appeared to predict the severity of chronic neuropathy, more prominently with oxaliplatin. Knowledge of the similarities and differences between neuropathy syndromes may provide insight into their underlying pathophysiology and inform future research to identify preventative treatment approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 29 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2019.
All research outputs
#19,508,360
of 24,849,927 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3,806
of 4,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,568
of 350,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#47
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,849,927 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.