↓ Skip to main content

Probing the Steric Space at the Floor of the D1 Dopamine Receptor Orthosteric Binding Domain: 7α-, 7β-, 8α-, and 8β-Methyl Substituted Dihydrexidine Analogues

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probing the Steric Space at the Floor of the D1 Dopamine Receptor Orthosteric Binding Domain: 7α-, 7β-, 8α-, and 8β-Methyl Substituted Dihydrexidine Analogues
Published in
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, July 2011
DOI 10.1021/jm200334c
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Pablo Cueva, Alejandra Gallardo-Godoy, Jose I. Juncosa, Pierre A. Vidi, Markus A. Lill, Val J. Watts, David E. Nichols

Abstract

To probe the space at the floor of the orthosteric ligand binding site in the dopamine D(1) receptor, four methylated analogues of dihydrexidine (DHX) were synthesized with substitutions at the 7 and 8 positions. The 8α-axial, 8β-equatorial, and 7α-equatorial were synthesized by photochemical cyclization of appropriately substituted N-benzoyl enamines, and the 7β-axial analogue was prepared by an intramolecular Henry reaction. All of the methylated analogues displayed losses in affinity when compared to DHX (20 nM): 8β-Me(ax)-DHX (270 nM), 8α-Me(eq)-DHX (920 nM), 7β-Me(eq)-DHX (6540 nM), and 7α-Me(ax)-DHX (>10000 nM). Molecular modeling studies suggest that although the disruption of an aromatic interaction between Phe203(5.47) and Phe288(6.51) is the cause for the 14-fold loss in affinity associated with 8β-axial substitution, unfavorable steric interactions with Ser107(3.36) result in the more dramatic decreases in binding affinity suffered by the rest of the analogues.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 20%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2011.
All research outputs
#3,551,498
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#5,828
of 22,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,832
of 116,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#34
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.