↓ Skip to main content

Genetic utility of broadly defined bipolar schizoaffective disorder as a diagnostic concept

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic utility of broadly defined bipolar schizoaffective disorder as a diagnostic concept
Published in
British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.061424
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. L. Hamshere, E. K. Green, I. R. Jones, L. Jones, V. Moskvina, G. Kirov, D. Grozeva, I. Nikolov, D. Vukcevic, S. Caesar, K. Gordon-Smith, C. Fraser, E. Russell, G. Breen, D. St Clair, D. A. Collier, A. H. Young, I. N. Ferrier, A. Farmer, P. McGuffin, P. A. Holmans, M. J. Owen, M. C. O’Donovan, N. Craddock

Abstract

Psychiatric phenotypes are currently defined according to sets of descriptive criteria. Although many of these phenotypes are heritable, it would be useful to know whether any of the various diagnostic categories in current use identify cases that are particularly helpful for biological-genetic research.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 82 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Professor 11 13%
Other 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 17%
Psychology 13 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,806,088
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Psychiatry
#2,013
of 6,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,184
of 449,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Psychiatry
#1,533
of 5,296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.