↓ Skip to main content

Satellite and surface temperature data at odds?

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, May 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Satellite and surface temperature data at odds?
Published in
Climatic Change, May 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf01093228
Authors

James Hansen, Helene Wilson, Makiko Sato, Reto Ruedy, Kathy Shah, Erik Hansen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,142,715
of 23,896,578 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#601
of 5,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280
of 25,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,896,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.