| Title |
A Framework for Representing Reticulate Evolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Combinatorics, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00026-004-0228-0 |
| Authors |
Mihaela Baroni, Charles Semple, Mike Steel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 23% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 43% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2012.
All research outputs
#5,577,619
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Combinatorics
#3
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,339
of 139,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Combinatorics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them