| Title |
Exploring Mouse Trap History
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolution: Education and Outreach, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12052-011-0315-8 |
| Authors |
Joachim L. Dagg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 23% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 27% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,184,732
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Evolution: Education and Outreach
#135
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,147
of 183,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution: Education and Outreach
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them