↓ Skip to main content

Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention during pregnancy on prenatal stress and mood: results of a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
298 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
631 Mendeley
Title
Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention during pregnancy on prenatal stress and mood: results of a pilot study
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00737-008-0214-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Vieten, J. Astin

Abstract

Stress and negative mood during pregnancy increase risk for poor childbirth outcomes and postnatal mood problems and may interfere with mother-infant attachment and child development. However, relatively little research has focused on the efficacy of psychosocial interventions to reduce stress and negative mood during pregnancy. In this study, we developed and pilot tested an eight-week mindfulness-based intervention directed toward reducing stress and improving mood in pregnancy and early postpartum. We then conducted a small randomized trial (n=31) comparing women who received the intervention during the last half of their pregnancy to a wait-list control group. Measures of perceived stress, positive and negative affect, depressed and anxious mood, and affect regulation were collected prior to, immediately following, and three months after the intervention (postpartum). Mothers who received the intervention showed significantly reduced anxiety (effect size, 0.89; p<0.05) and negative affect (effect size, 0.83; p<0.05) during the third trimester in comparison to those who did not receive the intervention. The brief and nonpharmaceutical nature of this intervention makes it a promising candidate for use during pregnancy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 631 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Sri Lanka 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 611 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 117 19%
Student > Master 87 14%
Researcher 70 11%
Student > Bachelor 65 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 62 10%
Other 123 19%
Unknown 107 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 255 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 87 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 7%
Social Sciences 42 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 4%
Other 57 9%
Unknown 125 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#917,742
of 25,088,711 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#53
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,829
of 91,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,088,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.