| Title |
Differential migration of the sexes cannot be explained by the body size hypothesis in Teal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10336-009-0375-5 |
| Authors |
Matthieu Guillemain, Richard Hearn, Roy King, Michel Gauthier-Clerc, Géraldine Simon, Alain Caizergues |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Romania | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 37% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 26% |
| Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2010.
All research outputs
#5,513,487
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#468
of 1,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,119
of 171,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.