Title |
Why Do Physicians Vary So Widely in Their Referral Rates?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2001
|
DOI | 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.04079.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter Franks, Geoffrey C. Williams, Jack Zwanziger, Cathleen Mooney, Melony Sorbero |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 98 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 17% |
Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 28 | 28% |
Unknown | 17 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 32% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
Psychology | 9 | 9% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 14% |
Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,084,832
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,581
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,657
of 131,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#26
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.