↓ Skip to main content

Why Do Physicians Vary So Widely in Their Referral Rates?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Why Do Physicians Vary So Widely in Their Referral Rates?
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2001
DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.04079.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Franks, Geoffrey C. Williams, Jack Zwanziger, Cathleen Mooney, Melony Sorbero

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 28 28%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 32%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Psychology 9 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,084,832
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,581
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,657
of 131,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#26
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.