↓ Skip to main content

Filtering of Visual Information in the Tectum by an Identified Neural Circuit

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Filtering of Visual Information in the Tectum by an Identified Neural Circuit
Published in
Science, October 2010
DOI 10.1126/science.1192949
Pubmed ID
Authors

Filippo Del Bene, Claire Wyart, Estuardo Robles, Amanda Tran, Loren Looger, Ethan K. Scott, Ehud Y. Isacoff, Herwig Baier

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 7 2%
Germany 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 335 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 92 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 24%
Student > Master 31 9%
Student > Bachelor 26 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 5%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 49 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 160 44%
Neuroscience 88 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 5%
Physics and Astronomy 9 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 2%
Other 27 7%
Unknown 55 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2010.
All research outputs
#4,495,230
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Science
#38,585
of 77,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,936
of 99,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#264
of 402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.