↓ Skip to main content

Numeracy Skills Explain Racial Differences in HIV Medication Management

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Numeracy Skills Explain Racial Differences in HIV Medication Management
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10461-009-9604-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Drenna Waldrop-Valverde, Chandra Y. Osborn, Allan Rodriguez, Russell L. Rothman, Mahendra Kumar, Deborah L. Jones

Abstract

Racial disparities in HIV/AIDS are well established and efforts to understand key factors that may explain these differences are needed. Recent evidence suggests that health literacy may contribute to disparities in health behaviors among African American HIV patients. One component of health literacy, numeracy, is emerging as an important skill for successful self management of medications. We therefore tested whether numeracy mediated the effects of race on medication management among HIV seropositive patients. Results showed that poor management of a simulated HIV medication regimen among African Americans and women was mediated by lower numeracy. Poor medication self-management may be a significant root cause for health disparities in African Americans with HIV/AIDS. Whether African American women may be at particular risk requires further study. Interventions to improve HIV medication self-management through addressing numeracy skills may help to narrow the gap in health disparities among African Americans with HIV/AIDS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 96 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 14%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 25 26%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Psychology 8 8%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2012.
All research outputs
#4,938,756
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#745
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,130
of 114,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.