↓ Skip to main content

Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on obesity, cardiometabolic disease and diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
180 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
19 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
499 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on obesity, cardiometabolic disease and diabetes
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00394-016-1345-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tauseef A. Khan, John L. Sievenpiper

Abstract

Fructose-containing sugars are a focus of attention as a public health target for their putative role in obesity and cardiometabolic disease including diabetes. The fructose moiety is singled out to be the primary driver for the harms of sugars due to its unique endocrine signal and pathophysiological role. However, this is only supported by ecological studies, animal models of overfeeding and select human intervention studies with supraphysiological doses or lack of control for energy. The highest level of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of controlled trials has not shown that fructose-containing sugars behave any differently from other forms of digestible carbohydrates. Fructose-containing sugars can only lead to weight gain and other unintended harms on cardiometabolic risk factors insofar as the excess calories they provide. Prospective cohort studies, which provide the strongest observational evidence, have shown an association between fructose-containing sugars and cardiometabolic risk including weight gain, cardiovascular disease outcomes and diabetes only when restricted to sugar-sweetened beverages and not for sugars from other sources. In fact, sugar-sweetened beverages are a marker of an unhealthy lifestyle and their drinkers consume more calories, exercise less, smoke more and have a poor dietary pattern. The potential for overconsumption of sugars in the form of sugary foods and drinks makes targeting sugars, as a source of excess calories, a prudent strategy. However, sugar content should not be the sole determinant of a healthy diet. There are many other factors in the diet-some providing excess calories while others provide beneficial nutrients. Rather than just focusing on one energy source, we should consider the whole diet for health benefits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 180 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 499 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 494 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 97 19%
Student > Bachelor 80 16%
Researcher 43 9%
Other 36 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 7%
Other 84 17%
Unknown 125 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 8%
Sports and Recreations 34 7%
Other 70 14%
Unknown 148 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#247,558
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#87
of 2,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,991
of 419,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.