You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A unified explanation of the Kadowaki–Woods ratio in strongly correlated metals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Physics, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nphys1249 |
| Authors |
A. C. Jacko, J. O. Fjærestad, B. J. Powell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 22% |
| Researcher | 32 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 85 | 59% |
| Materials Science | 19 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,953,615
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Nature Physics
#2,002
of 4,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,994
of 94,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Physics
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.