Title |
A “fermi-liquid” description of the Kondo problem at low temperatures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Low Temperature Physics, October 1974
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00654541 |
Authors |
P. Nozières |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 4 | 2% |
United States | 4 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
France | 2 | 1% |
Denmark | 2 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 151 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 32% |
Researcher | 37 | 22% |
Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
Professor | 10 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 131 | 77% |
Chemistry | 6 | 4% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Materials Science | 2 | 1% |
Social Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 25 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,839,208
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Low Temperature Physics
#15
of 619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Low Temperature Physics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them