↓ Skip to main content

The role of discounting and dynamics in determining the economic efficiency of time-area closures for managing fishery bycatch

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Ecology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
The role of discounting and dynamics in determining the economic efficiency of time-area closures for managing fishery bycatch
Published in
Theoretical Ecology, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12080-010-0093-x
Authors

Paul R. Armsworth, Barbara A. Block, Josh Eagle, Joan E. Roughgarden

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Jersey 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 54 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 8 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 38%
Environmental Science 13 22%
Mathematics 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Ecology
#85
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,247
of 99,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Ecology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.