| Title |
The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): A Discipline-Specific Approach to Assessing Moral Judgment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science and Engineering Ethics, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11948-009-9148-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason Borenstein, Matthew J. Drake, Robert Kirkman, Julie L. Swann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 68 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 21% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 18 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#499
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,773
of 113,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.