↓ Skip to main content

Integrating ethics into technical courses: Micro-insertion

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Integrating ethics into technical courses: Micro-insertion
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11948-006-0066-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Davis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 10 29%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 29%
Social Sciences 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Philosophy 3 9%
Computer Science 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#499
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,122
of 160,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them