| Title |
What happens in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science and Engineering Ethics, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11948-011-9317-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daan Schuurbiers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 127 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 23% |
| Researcher | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 32 | 24% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 7% |
| Philosophy | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 27% |
| Unknown | 34 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#499
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,937
of 144,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.