↓ Skip to main content

The cross-interaction between global and age-comparative self-rated health on depressive symptoms–considering both the individual and combined effects

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
The cross-interaction between global and age-comparative self-rated health on depressive symptoms–considering both the individual and combined effects
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-1098-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaeyong Shin, Eun-Cheol Park, Sang Gyu Lee, Young Choi, Jae-Hyun Kim, Tae Hyun Kim

Abstract

Numerous studies suggesting the relation between self-rated health (SRH) and depression have been reported using different measures. Therefore, we attempted to determine the difference in a depressive scale based on the different ways of measuring health between global SRH (SRH-global) and age-comparative SRH (SRH-age). Then, the combined effect of SRH-global and SRH-age on depressive symptoms was further investigated. Data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing (KLoSA) from 2008 to 2012 were analyzed. We divided the SRH-global and SRH-age into three levels-high, middle, and low-and combined each into nine new categories (SRH-combi). The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-10 Korean edition was used as the dependent variable. A total of 8621 participant were enrolled at baseline. Individuals with lower SRHs-age compared to SRH-global tended to be more vulnerable to depressive symptoms. Low SRH-global with low (b = 0.654, p < 0.001) and middle SRH-age (b = 0.210, p = 0.003) showed association with higher CESD scores. Participants with high SRH-global × low SRH-age also had higher scores (b = 0.536, p < 0.001) compared to the "middle SRH-global × middle SRH-age" reference group. In contrast, among the middle (b = -0.696, p < 0.001) and high SRH-global (b = -0.545, p < 0.001) groups, participants with superior SRH-age had statistically lower CESD scores than the reference group. Although a sole general SRH has historically been widely used, it has been suggested that use of both general and age-comparative SRH would be more powerful and easy when we consider analyzing depression in old age.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Psychology 3 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 35%