| Title |
High-flow oxygen via tracheostomy improves oxygenation in patients weaning from mechanical ventilation: a randomised crossover study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-016-4634-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amanda Corley, Melannie Edwards, Amy J. Spooner, Kimble R. Dunster, Chris Anstey, John F. Fraser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Italy | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Greece | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 24% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,362,548
of 24,775,802 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,763
of 5,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,878
of 426,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#21
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,775,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.