Title |
Painful os intermetatarseum in athletes: report of four cases and review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, July 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00402-006-0195-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tomoyuki Nakasa, Kohei Fukuhara, Nobuo Adachi, Mitsuo Ochi |
Abstract |
A painful os intermetatarseum, which described the compression of the deep peroneal nerve by an os intermetatarseum, is a very rare condition. The authors reported four cases of painful os intermetatarseum in athletes and reviewed the present literature. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Japan | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 17 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 21% |
Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 47% |
Psychology | 2 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2011.
All research outputs
#3,465,367
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#83
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,405
of 66,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them