↓ Skip to main content

Painful os intermetatarseum in athletes: report of four cases and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Painful os intermetatarseum in athletes: report of four cases and review of the literature
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00402-006-0195-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomoyuki Nakasa, Kohei Fukuhara, Nobuo Adachi, Mitsuo Ochi

Abstract

A painful os intermetatarseum, which described the compression of the deep peroneal nerve by an os intermetatarseum, is a very rare condition. The authors reported four cases of painful os intermetatarseum in athletes and reviewed the present literature.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Japan 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Psychology 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2011.
All research outputs
#3,465,367
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#83
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,405
of 66,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them