Title |
Ventilator-associated pneumonia: current status and future recommendations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, March 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10877-010-9228-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shai Efrati, Israel Deutsch, Massimo Antonelli, Peter M. Hockey, Ronen Rozenblum, Gabriel M. Gurman |
Abstract |
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common hazardous complication in ICU patients. The aim of the current review is to give an update on the current status and future recommendations for VAP prevention. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 89 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Other | 21 | 22% |
Unknown | 18 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2012.
All research outputs
#3,259,353
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#55
of 662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,500
of 106,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them