↓ Skip to main content

The N2HDM under theoretical and experimental scrutiny

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
The N2HDM under theoretical and experimental scrutiny
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/jhep03(2017)094
Authors

Margarete Mühlleitner, Marco O. P. Sampaio, Rui Santos, Jonas Wittbrodt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 12 80%
Mathematics 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,356,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#11,303
of 24,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,868
of 338,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#219
of 409 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 409 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.