↓ Skip to main content

Randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcome of two compression bandaging systems and standard care without compression in patients with venous leg ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcome of two compression bandaging systems and standard care without compression in patients with venous leg ulcers
Published in
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology, November 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04327.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

I.K.Y. Wong, A. Andriessen, H.E. Charles, D. Thompson, D.T.F. Lee, W.K.W. So, M. Abel

Abstract

In Hong Kong, at the time of the study, compression treatment was not considered usual care for venous leg ulcer patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 27 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 28 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,863,953
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology
#558
of 5,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,961
of 153,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology
#5
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.