↓ Skip to main content

The Costs of Accepting Gender Differences: The Role of Stereotype Endorsement in Women's Experience in the Math Domain

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
278 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
Title
The Costs of Accepting Gender Differences: The Role of Stereotype Endorsement in Women's Experience in the Math Domain
Published in
Sex Roles, June 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:sers.0000029101.74557.a0
Authors

Toni Schmader, Michael Johns, Marchelle Barquissau

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 280 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 21%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 10%
Researcher 28 10%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 53 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 127 44%
Social Sciences 59 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Arts and Humanities 4 1%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 57 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#1,217
of 2,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,858
of 62,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.