| Title |
Benthic biogeochemistry beneath the Mississippi River plume
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Estuaries and Coasts, June 1999
|
| DOI | 10.2307/1352977 |
| Authors |
John W. Morse, Gilbert T. Rowe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Réunion | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 35% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 19% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2000.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Estuaries and Coasts
#498
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,564
of 35,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuaries and Coasts
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.