↓ Skip to main content

A preliminary mass balance model of primary productivity and dissolved oxygen in the Mississippi River Plume/Inner Gulf Shelf Region

Overview of attention for article published in Estuaries and Coasts, December 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
A preliminary mass balance model of primary productivity and dissolved oxygen in the Mississippi River Plume/Inner Gulf Shelf Region
Published in
Estuaries and Coasts, December 1994
DOI 10.2307/1352756
Authors

Victor J. Bierman, Scott C. Hinz, Dong-Wei Zhu, William J. Wiseman, Nancy N. Rabalais, R. Eugene Turner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 22%
Engineering 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2000.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Estuaries and Coasts
#498
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,003
of 76,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuaries and Coasts
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.