| Title |
Are marine reserves effective in management of reef fisheries?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, September 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00042662 |
| Authors |
Callum M. Roberts, Nicholas V. C. Polunin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 249 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 19% |
| Researcher | 47 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 123 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 76 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,461,549
of 25,425,223 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#272
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,041
of 16,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,425,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.