| Title |
Effects of isolation by distance and geographical discontinuity on genetic subdivision of Littoraria cingulata
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, September 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002270050395 |
| Authors |
M. S. Johnson, R. Black |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2001.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,340
of 3,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,999
of 31,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them