↓ Skip to main content

Construction of an impervious diaphragm for improvement of a subsurface water-reservoir and simultaneous protection from migrating salt water

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, December 1981
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 200)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Construction of an impervious diaphragm for improvement of a subsurface water-reservoir and simultaneous protection from migrating salt water
Published in
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, December 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf02595269
Authors

C. N. Garagunis

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1999.
All research outputs
#7,863,403
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
#35
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,498
of 31,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them