| Title |
Ecological and Biogeochemical Interactions Constrain Planktonic Nitrogen Fixation in Estuaries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, November 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-002-0176-7 |
| Authors |
Roxanne Marino, Francis Chan, Robert W. Howarth, Michael Pace, Gene E. Likens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cuba | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 22 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2004.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#635
of 1,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,639
of 49,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.