↓ Skip to main content

LCA — how it came about

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
LCA — how it came about
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, September 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02978943
Authors

Ian Boustead

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Master 5 5%
Researcher 3 3%
Professor 2 2%
Student > Bachelor 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 84 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 <1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 88 84%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2004.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#445
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,902
of 30,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them