| Title |
Professional codes: Why, how, and with what impact?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, February 1989
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00382575 |
| Authors |
Mark S. Frankel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 14% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 38 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 19% |
| Engineering | 11 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 10 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 22% |
| Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#682
of 3,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,050
of 54,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.