↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry with Clinical Decision Support on the Rates of Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
262 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry with Clinical Decision Support on the Rates of Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic Review
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11606-008-0504-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesse I. Wolfstadt, Jerry H. Gurwitz, Terry S. Field, Monica Lee, Sunila Kalkar, Wei Wu, Paula A. Rochon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 5%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Argentina 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 235 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 18%
Researcher 44 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 14%
Other 20 7%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 66 24%
Unknown 33 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 42%
Computer Science 28 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Psychology 11 4%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 41 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,640,141
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,985
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,276
of 83,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#10
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.