| Title |
Indices of landscape pattern
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape Ecology, May 1988
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00162741 |
| Authors |
R. V. O'Neill, J. R. Krummel, R. H. Gardner, G. Sugihara, B. Jackson, D. L. DeAngelis, B. T. Milne, M. G. Turner, B. Zygmunt, S. W. Christensen, V. H. Dale, R. L. Graham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 902 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 3% |
| Brazil | 13 | 1% |
| Canada | 8 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Colombia | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Israel | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 31 | 3% |
| Unknown | 804 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 205 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 186 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 134 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 5% |
| Other | 177 | 20% |
| Unknown | 104 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 291 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 266 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 83 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 4% |
| Engineering | 23 | 3% |
| Other | 63 | 7% |
| Unknown | 138 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1998.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#922
of 1,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,882
of 13,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them