↓ Skip to main content

A review of models of landscape change

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape Ecology, March 1989
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
393 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
643 Mendeley
Title
A review of models of landscape change
Published in
Landscape Ecology, March 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf00137155
Authors

William L. Baker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 643 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 21 3%
Brazil 10 2%
Mexico 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Colombia 3 <1%
Ghana 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Other 24 4%
Unknown 567 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 148 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 132 21%
Student > Master 85 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 37 6%
Other 132 21%
Unknown 67 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 228 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 165 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 65 10%
Social Sciences 21 3%
Engineering 16 2%
Other 47 7%
Unknown 101 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,724,156
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#445
of 1,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,594
of 14,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them