↓ Skip to main content

Improved estimation of academic cheating behavior using the randomized response technique

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Higher Education, March 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Improved estimation of academic cheating behavior using the randomized response technique
Published in
Research in Higher Education, March 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00991933
Authors

N. J. Scheers, C. Mitchell Dayton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Lecturer 4 13%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 9 28%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 16%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Psychology 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 9%
Mathematics 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 8 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1992.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Research in Higher Education
#389
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,223
of 11,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Higher Education
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.