↓ Skip to main content

Conservation planning with dynamic threats: The role of spatial design and priority setting for species’ persistence

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservation planning with dynamic threats: The role of spatial design and priority setting for species’ persistence
Published in
Biological Conservation, March 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.018
Authors

Piero Visconti, Robert L. Pressey, Daniel B. Segan, Brendan A. Wintle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 13 5%
United States 5 2%
Australia 4 2%
Italy 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 223 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 21%
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Postgraduate 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 18 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 44%
Environmental Science 89 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Design 3 1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 33 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2013.
All research outputs
#6,745,792
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#3,564
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,099
of 102,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#19
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.