↓ Skip to main content

Minimum data requirements for designing a set of marine protected areas, using commonly available abiotic and biotic datasets

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Minimum data requirements for designing a set of marine protected areas, using commonly available abiotic and biotic datasets
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10531-008-9560-8
Authors

Natalie C. Ban

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Brazil 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 158 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 20%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 11 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 38%
Environmental Science 60 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 33 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2013.
All research outputs
#5,015,863
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#761
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,445
of 174,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.