You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Change the IUCN Protected Area Categories to Reflect Biodiversity Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Biology, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060066 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luigi Boitani, Richard M Cowling, Holly T Dublin, Georgina M Mace, Jeff Parrish, Hugh P Possingham, Robert L Pressey, Carlo Rondinini, Kerrie A Wilson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Argentina | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 3% |
| Unknown | 280 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 77 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
| Professor | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 65 | 20% |
| Unknown | 41 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 130 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 101 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 3% |
| Unknown | 45 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,466,005
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#4,457
of 9,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,780
of 97,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#34
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.