You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Irreplaceability of river networks: towards catchment‐based conservation planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01520.x |
| Authors |
S. Linke, R. H. Norris, R. L. Pressey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| South Africa | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 173 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 80 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 38% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,445,068
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,035
of 3,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,669
of 91,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.