↓ Skip to main content

Coral Disease Diagnostics: What's between a Plague and a Band?▿

Overview of attention for article published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coral Disease Diagnostics: What's between a Plague and a Band?▿
Published in
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2006
DOI 10.1128/aem.02172-06
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. D. Ainsworth, E. Kramasky-Winter, Y. Loya, O. Hoegh-Guldberg, M. Fine

Abstract

Recently, reports of coral disease have increased significantly across the world's tropical oceans. Despite increasing efforts to understand the changing incidence of coral disease, very few primary pathogens have been identified, and most studies remain dependent on the external appearance of corals for diagnosis. Given this situation, our current understanding of coral disease and the progression and underlying causes thereof is very limited. In the present study, we use structural and microbial studies to differentiate different forms of black band disease: atypical black band disease and typical black band disease. Atypical black band diseased corals were infected with the black band disease microbial consortium yet did not show any of the typical external signs of black band disease based on macroscopic observations. In previous studies, these examples, here referred to as atypical black band disease, would have not been correctly diagnosed. We also differentiate white syndrome from white diseases on the basis of tissue structure and the presence/absence of microbial associates. White diseases are those with dense bacterial communities associated with lesions of symbiont loss and/or extensive necrosis of tissues, while white syndromes are characteristically bacterium free, with evidence for extensive programmed cell death/apoptosis associated with the lesion and the adjacent tissues. The pathology of coral disease as a whole requires further investigation. This study emphasizes the importance of going beyond the external macroscopic signs of coral disease for accurate disease diagnosis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 4 2%
United States 4 2%
Mexico 4 2%
Colombia 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 213 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 20%
Researcher 45 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 18%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Other 16 7%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 20 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 55%
Environmental Science 50 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 <1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 24 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2013.
All research outputs
#6,745,792
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#7,082
of 19,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,379
of 168,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#57
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.