You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conservation planning with irreplaceability: does the method matter?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-006-9055-4 |
| Authors |
J. Carwardine, W. A. Rochester, K. S. Richardson, K. J. Williams, R. L. Pressey, H. P. Possingham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 10 | 3% |
| South Africa | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Italy | 4 | 1% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 334 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 101 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 13% |
| Other | 29 | 8% |
| Professor | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 81 | 21% |
| Unknown | 33 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 160 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 143 | 37% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2013.
All research outputs
#6,242,558
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#906
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,269
of 67,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.